Integration Capability

Integration Capability layer

It shows how easy/hard each app is to integrate.

GEMINI Munich PoC App

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Parking data provider APIs may be missing; data mismatches

System Compatibility: Depends on alignment with MLL backend

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Requires knowledge of traffic management systems and DevOps


BlueFlow

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Ticket system compatibility; data privacy constraints

System Compatibility: Requires custom connectors for legacy systems

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Needs GDPR compliance and OAuth management


HSL Route Planner

Ease of Integration: 5 / 5

Challenges: Minimal (public APIs are stable)

System Compatibility: Fully compatible with MLL ecosystem

Tech Expertise Required: Low

Maintenance Difficulty: Low

Notes: Preferred integration platform for new services


GEMINI Munich PoC App

Type: MaaS Application

Provider: TBD (under development)

Used In: Munich
Challenge Addressed: Integration with traffic management; data format mismatches; security/authentication needs

Notes: To be piloted for Allianz Arena visitors


Bosse Route Planner

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: Limited to Finnish municipal ecosystems

System Compatibility: High in local context

Tech Expertise Required: Low

Maintenance Difficulty: Low


Clem.mobi

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Proprietary API and platform dependency

System Compatibility: Medium

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Custom code exchange required for offline access


Goodmoves APP

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Integration of invoicing systems and IoT parameters

System Compatibility: Medium

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Uses ERP (Odoo) with custom modules


Parkin Saclay

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: GBFS vs custom protocol alignment

System Compatibility: High

Tech Expertise Required: Medium

Maintenance Difficulty: Low


IDFM

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: Integration of public and private mobility data

System Compatibility: High

Tech Expertise Required: Medium

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium


Dott

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Varied file formats, mapping differences, scalability

System Compatibility: Depends on city platform

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Standardization needed for smoother integration

Keppler

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: Not designed as a transport integration tool

System Compatibility: High (for analytics use)

Tech Expertise Required: Medium

Maintenance Difficulty: Low


OnzeAuto by GoodMoovs

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: Backoffice and hardware integration complexity

System Compatibility: High with supported OEMs

Tech Expertise Required: High

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Notes: Requires onboarding and technical setup support


MooneyGo

Ease of Integration: 4 / 5

Challenges: Payment systems and legacy integration

System Compatibility: High with modern platforms

Tech Expertise Required: Medium

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium

Gemini (Turin)

Ease of Integration: 3 / 5

Challenges: Inherited from MooneyGo; regional customization needed

System Compatibility: Medium

Tech Expertise Required: Medium

Maintenance Difficulty: Medium